
A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET - I'm not a huge fan of horror remakes, especially ones based on iconic films, but this remake does manage to do something the original film didn't, which is
be really terrible.
I wish someone had warned me that this wasn't actually a remake of 'A Nightmare On Elm Street', the clever slasher film I loved as a kid, but rather the Lifetime Network's dramatic rendering of 'A Molestation On Elm Street' - since I kept waiting for the gripping courtroom scene where the teenagers testify about the abuse they suffered at the hands of one Frederick R. Krueger, and then point out on a doll where he touched them. Because this version was all molestation, all the time. No waiting. Jackie Earle Haley should have just played it as his character from 'Little Children' instead of Freddy Krueger, because at least then it might have been scary, instead of just gross.
In the original, Freddy Krueger's history is told very briefly by Nancy's drunk mother about halfway through the film (which she awesomely caps with, "He's dead, honey. Because Mommy killed him.") - and that was pretty much it. Moving on. Because while Freddy's backstory was needed to explain who he was, it in NO WAY stopped him from killing you. Freddy being a molester was beside the point in the original - but in this version the characters run around like a bad Scooby-Doo episode for most of the film trying to solve 'The Mystery of The Haunted Preschool' in order to find out what happened to them as kids and possibly clear Freddy's (un)good name. But for all the plot importance they put on solving this history mystery, it still in NO WAY stops him from killing you. It's not like you can reason with him and make him see the error of his ways -
he's a nightmare being who wants to kill you in your sleep. He's not exactly open to suggestion. Not to mention that innocent people don't tend to make gloves with knives for fingers or enjoy cutting up teenagers. So there's your first big clue, Mystery Inc. In the end it just amounted to a lot of backstory masturbation and a huge waste of time.
The worst part of this 'Law & Order: SVU' version is that it reduces Freddy Krueger to cameo appearances and flashbacks, thus giving him little personality or screen time at all. In the original series, Freddy loves his job. He's positively gleeful about killing teens in their sleep, he almost prances - but in this film he's serious as stone and doesn't seem like he's having any fun at all. He's just an angry guy trying to relive his glory days. He's molesty Springsteen. And
oh, oh, oh, he's (been set) on fire.
Adding to the problem were the multiple points of view. The original film was Nancy's story, except for Tina's death at the beginning, all the dream sequences were Nancy's alone. This gave it an intimacy, so the audience went through the nightmares with her and learned about Freddy Krueger at the same time she did. But in this version, all of the characters have nightmares (the original series didn't do that until the sequels, when Freddy's character was already established), and it really hurt the film. It made it feel ungrounded, robbed Freddy of any presence or connection with the audience, and kept you from really rooting for Nancy when she finally became the main character.
I don't understand why these bad remakes are always so obsessed with fleshing out the backstory. Why? It's much scarier not knowing everything - to have it revealed as little bits of history during the filler scenes, not shown in extended detail or made central to the plot. Because nothing takes the scary out of a film faster than trying to make us understand, or god forbid,
feel sympathy for the maniac psycho killer. These are slasher films, for crap's sake. Not 'Manhunter'. Less is more.
But maybe I'm wrong. Maybe we need more slasher films redone as serious dramas. Maybe we need to know all about Jason Voorhees' troubled childhood with his crazy mother, never allowed to do anything without someone watching, or see him struggle with his facial deformity and getting rejected by pretty girl campers - when all he really wants is to be a goalie. It would be just like 'Mask' - only with brutal murder instead of bikers and a mother who isn't nearly as scary as Cher. I want to feel his crazy pain.
Ugh. No. I don't. I just want him scary and killing campers. That 'Friday The 13th' remake got it right. Because it never tried to be a drama. It was just a scary slasher film. And amen to that.
My main problem with this new version of 'A Nightmare On Elm Street' is that it isn't scary. It is creepy and gross, because of all the kid-touching stuff, but it's hardly a horror movie. They spent so much time filling in his backstory that Freddy never got a chance to actually BE scary. He's more of a molesty uncle with bad skin. And that's why it's terrible.
Thumbs down.
.